← Back to all comparisons
TaskWithAI vs Jira
The industry standard for engineering teams — and proudly so. But if you're a 10-person SME running operations, finance, ops AND dev on it, it's overkill.
TaskWithAI
TaskWithAI
$1.99/ seat / mo
vs
Competitor
Jira
$8/ seat / mo
Save $721.2 / year (75% less) for a 10-person team
Where Jira over-does it
Bloat you’re paying for
- − Sprints, epics, story points, workflow schemes for every team — including ones that don't ship code
- − Bewildering admin: schemes for issues, fields, screens, workflows, notifications, permissions
- − Confluence, Bitbucket, Compass — separate products, separate bills
- − Per-user pricing tiers up to $14.50+ for advanced features
What TaskWithAI gives instead
Just what you need
- ＋ Project + tasks + subtasks. That's the hierarchy. No three-level scheme matrix.
- ＋ One tool, one price, one set of permissions
- ＋ Time logs and attendance for non-engineering teams without bolting on a second app
- ＋ Most SMEs don't need NASA — they need to know who's working on what, when it's due, and what hours people put in.
What it costs over a year
A 10-person team, monthly billing, no annual discount applied for either side.
TaskWithAI — 10 users
Per user / month
$1.99
10 users / month
$19.9
10 users / year
$238.8
Jira — 10 users
Per user / month
$8
10 users / month
$80
10 users / year
$960
That’s an extra $721.2 going to Jira every year for the same job.
When Jira is the right choice
Honesty section. If any of these apply to you, stick with Jira:
- You already have a multi-year contract with deep workflow customisation.
- You’re a 100+ person org with full-time admins who love permission schemes.
- You need niche integrations that we don’t plan to build.
If you’re a 5–50 person team trying to keep the project tool from becoming a second full-time job, TaskWithAI is built for you.
Try TaskWithAI free for 7 days.
No credit card. Move your team over, see how it feels, then decide.